|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 5 post(s) |
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.11 23:20:00 -
[1]
I didn't check this on Sisi. Is this for real and not just a massive troll? If troll, epic job.
If real: Jesus Christ, what in your right mind made you think this would be a wise decision?
This would be so horrendously ****ed up that I can't even think of a sentence to describe it properly. You'd have basically "reinvented" a shipclass that was on the fringe of uselessness since its birth only to make a hundred percent sure, that it stays that way while being on a seemingly balanced path before.
I can't wrap my head around this. Just in awe in front of "THE STUPID", if true.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 19:03:00 -
[2]
I am one of those guys who have a MS in the cooker atm. Therefore I am seriously ****ed of course.
Furthermore there will be one of my chars rendered pretty much useless in the very near future and you can't explain the logic behind this change no matter what. The previous posters in this thread have said over and over again why this change makes the xCarrier fit a special role there is absolutely no need for.
Additionally: LolDCU.
I am seriously and really angry atm which makes me wonder why I feel anger over internet-spaceships. I should probably just take a break.
Suggestion for the future to CCP: Get someone who has a clue of public relations in charge of the planning and announcement of gamechanges.
And last point (and an obvious one): Fire the ***got who came up with this ****.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.12 23:52:00 -
[3]
Originally by: Sarah Norbulk I'd lay money on the fact that CCP ignores this thread. Posts their dev blog on 'rebalancing' the non-broken S-Carriers. Then ignores the massive forum thread complaining about the dev blog and basically says FU players. We are CCP and we don't give a **** about our old players so long as there are plenty of new players coming in.
Unfortunately signed. I am a classic case of a fanboy. But this is just ... I am out of words for that one.
I am signing out for the night, because I am not in the state of mind to state my thoughts on this on a neutral and constructive level. It's just sad, really.
I'll get the char into the thing. Log off afterwards and prolly unsub to lurk and wait for better days in the faint hope that they are coming.
G'Night guys.
P.S.: Yes, this is a BAAAWWWW-Post.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.13 18:22:00 -
[4]
1. I am happy that you are actually listening to us.
2. What the hell? You do realise that making the things dockable and much less expensive will give you a massive headache in 3-4 months. MOM-squads that'll pwnzor everything in their path is all I have to say about this.
3. The problem of not hitting Capitals for full damage still remains, which doesn't make sense.
4. An explanation why the former version of the Supercarriers were in need of tweeking. Because this version now is the sure road to Supercarriers Online whereas before i didn't see this issue.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.14 01:46:00 -
[5]
CCP Nozh has to be an account to announce bad news or else this is beyond me.
I don't know how the **** you'll gonna repair this mess.
There is no reason whatsoever to do these changes. None.
I don't get it. The proposed changes do make it a lot worse and don't improve anything at all.
Docking Supercarriers. Way to go.
Have fun guys, Greg
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.14 17:29:00 -
[6]
Yo, just dropping by this thread on day 3 of "CCP went full ******"-comedy.
Stopped raging and began laughing at the mess about a day ago.
Have fun with the ****up and look at the bright side guys.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.15 00:55:00 -
[7]
I'd like to get a sequel now.
It's weekend and all, but I am still waiting for the next change of the stats.
It's great fun to watch braindead people do stuff.
And I am pretty sure that you'll catch me offguard and do something I didn't see coming. And I am one hundred percent sure that it'll be awfully stupid.
GG CCP.
/rant off.
P.S.: Just laughing about it now. It's awesome to watch people without a clue doing something that others had sorted for them.
Random "Free Abathur"-Quote in here.
|
Greg DaimYo
Caldari Biotronics Inc. Majesta Empire
|
Posted - 2009.11.16 23:38:00 -
[8]
Originally by: Drachenlord There's a Lot of QQing and *****ing and whinging in this thread... Mostly from people who bought Motherships after the initial devblog went out.
Now, the thing is, As Angelus said... there was warning that a cost reduction was going to be coming around for these things, and those that recently bought These ships are the ones that are screaming the loudest against the cost reduction. Even if CCP says now that they plan to reimburse you in some way...
Which, is an interesting precedent is it not? where else in the world is your money returned if you lose your ass on a bad high risk investment?
Face Facts... 600 (or even 1500 to be generous) or so of the 300k subscribers in this game have a supercarrier... that's a drop in the bucket... CCP will do whats best for the game as a whole and not for the Vocal 1% (less in this case)
HOWEVER... there is one HUGE problem.. Don't let these things dock... in ANY station EVER... Docking games with normal carriers is bad enough...
So... My Opinion on how Supercarriers should be changed (its a compromise!)
1 - NO Docking - Allow us to Password Lock Hangar Arrays so nobody can get at the ships while stored, but the pilots. 2 - Keep the Build Cost Reduction As planned - I leave it to CCP to decide whether or not a reimbursement is really a good idea to appease .5% of the subscriber base. (flame away, I don't care) 3 - 2 Fighters/Fighter Bombers per level, You wanted 1, we Want 3... so its a fair compromise... oh, Stop Balancing around DCUs as well.. please 4 - Revert the Explosion Radius of the Compact Torps back to the initial stats, and give the Bombers a little more HP. 5 - Keep the Current plan to increase Jump Range to Dreadnought Level..
I think with this solution, people would be able to live with the Supercarrier class.
Also... side note for Titans... revert the Capital Weapon bonuses back to 200% vs 100% Ninja nerfing that was pretty bad... Titans need to be able to project some decent damage more than once every 5 damn minutes.
I could basically live with this. Jumprange needs to be kept at 5 ly imo though.
And I wouldn't mind a reimbursement, i could do some evil things with the ISK.
Titans are awfully bad in their current incarnation.
And please fix the performanceissues I (and others) are having on Sisi lately. The planets show properly since the latest patch but 5 fps isn't funny when you were able to run a dual-client without any problems prior to the patch.
|
|
|
|